Mark Miracle | April 19th, 2021
Choosing to move forward with a new ERP solution is a significant undertaking for any company, even more so when the company happens to be a small to medium size manufacturer that generally has more functional areas to consider and likely has more budgetary constraints. The hope is that for the money and effort invested, the implemented ERP system will provide the backbone of the business, connecting all the functional areas within the company to improve decision making, efficiency and the customer experience while also reducing expenses and redundant manual processes.
A well implemented and correctly utilized ERP solution should be able to return multiples of the initial investment over the course of a few years and should continue to provide benefits as the business grows and the system is continually refined to meet changing needs.
Considering the cost and potential benefit involved, companies should do their due diligence in evaluating their potential choices when it comes to finding the right ERP solution.
Because the marketplace for ERP products continues to change, there are a host of factors to be considered that can make the evaluation more cumbersome. Among these factors are increased vendor options, evolving systems functionality, changing deployment methods and improved implementation tools, all while information (and disinformation) is more readily available from more and more sources.
Having been involved in over forty ERP evaluations in recent years, the frustration and confusion that these factors can cause for the evaluating company is evident. Based on personal experience, here are some suggestions to mitigate the frustration and confusion of ERP evaluation that will likely make the experience and resulting decision more satisfactory:
Based on the positive impact assumptions from step one above, it is also necessary to establish a realistic budget to narrow down the field of options. The least expensive options may not solve the problems, and the options that do may be out of the initial budgetary range. Balancing all the various financial considerations, try to establish a budget number in line with the problems that need to be solved and the resulting benefits.
Now is a good time to establish how open the team is to making changes and what critical aspects of your business must remain unchanged. No doubt this initial assessment will be modified as you get deeper in the evaluation process, but it makes sense to have a starting point.
In some cases, the software provider does not offer deployment options, so that could be a consideration as well. If you are interested in reading more about deployment methods and some of the general pros and cons, please review our blog on Cloud ERP vs On Premise Comparison.
From a product perspective, having completed steps one, three, four and five should help you narrow the field considerably. Budget considerations aside, a good ERP system will have the broad and deep functionality to handle most of the requirements across your organization while also providing the flexibility to be modified in those instances where you may need it. Additionally, depending on the complexity of your business, it may make sense to look at an industry specific ERP solution that is specifically designed to solve some of the challenges you may be facing. To narrow down the field even further, there are many sources available that provide product comparisons but be aware that those sources may not always be as knowledgeable or independent as they claim. It is generally a good idea to cover most of your requirements with the fewest number of products to avoid potentially costly integrations.
Implementation has become somewhat of a hot topic within the ERP software industry over the last few years. As training and implementation tools continue to improve, software providers are packaging these tools into programs that claim to yield faster and less expensive implementations, providing your requirements fit within predetermined system functionality. You may want to consider these programs if your company has the resources and highly experienced staff necessary to take on the full burden of an implementation, but most companies, especially those in the SMB manufacturing space, tend to be resource constrained.
For those that will require standard implementation services, ensure that the providers implementation methodology will work for your needs. Unfortunately, that conversation often happens too late in the evaluation process when the field has been narrowed down to two or three providers.
Establishing a reasonable and mutually agreed upon schedule of events in the beginning, and then making sure that time-line is adhered too, can eliminate much confusion throughout the process. One critical, but often overlooked event that should be on this schedule is a discovery meeting in which the provider and evaluation team can ensure that all major requirements will be addressed in the subsequent demonstration (check out this article for more information).
On a final note, a properly executed ERP evaluation requires time, effort and attention to detail. Anything less and the resulting decision could create issues for many years to come. Considering that the internal team members are often already resource constrained, some companies will rely on outside sources to help them through the evaluation process. If you do choose to move in this direction it is important that you find a partner that has specific experience in this area within your industry and that they are not tied to a specific software provider.
Mark Miracle is the VP of Sales for LogicData and has been personally involved in over 50 ERP selection processes over the past 3 years. LogicData is a Channel partner for Infor, a leading enterprise software provider. Over the past 30 years, LogicData has been focused on helping SMB manufacturing clients implement SyteLine ERP offered by Infor.
As with cost, implementation time is also dependent on the same factors mentioned above. LogicData offers multiple implementation methodologies that can be adapted to your specific needs and resource availability. Considering a very basic implementation of just the core functionality of SyteLine, and employing a LogicData managed implementation approach, time to value can be achieved in as little as 3-4 months. A full implementation of all core SyteLine functionality utilizing a standard implementation approach, and assuming full client resource availability, can generally be completed in 6 to 8 months. To determine the best implementation methodology and timeline estimate for your specific situation, please contact us.
The cost of software and implementation will vary based on many factors such as user count, functionality requirements, deployment, implementation methodology, customization, data conversion, integration, and internal resources. However, for a basic configuration of SyteLine annual subscription pricing can begin at approximately $18,000 annually for a minimum of 10 users or a one-time cost of $20,000 plus annual maintenance for a minimum of 5 users in an on-premise deployment. A primarily self-directed implementation of such a basic configuration, although not recommended, can likely be achieved for approximately $30,000. LogicData recommends our standard “train-the-trainer” implementation approach which is estimated to start at roughly $65,000 for a basic implementation. For further information on pricing specific to your needs, please contact us.